Formula Used
Importance definitions differ across boosting libraries. Compare only compatible methods and scales. Treat importance as model evidence, not causal proof.
How to Use
- Paste feature importance data or upload a supported file.
- Select aggregation, scaling, filtering, and comparison options.
- Choose a chart style and presentation settings.
- Press Calculate and Plot to generate ranked results.
- Review warnings, cumulative coverage, and stability information.
- Export the table, chart, or complete PDF report.
Example Data Format
| feature | importance | model | method | fold | group |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| annual_income | 0.286 | XGBoost | Gain | 1 | Financial |
| credit_score | 0.244 | XGBoost | Gain | 1 | Financial |
| account_age | 0.151 | XGBoost | Gain | 1 | History |
Frequently Asked Questions
What is boosting feature importance?
It estimates each predictor's contribution inside a fitted boosting model.
How does gain importance work?
Gain measures average improvement produced by splits using each feature.
What is split importance?
Split importance counts how frequently trees use a given feature.
What is cover importance?
Cover reflects observations affected by splits involving each feature.
Why do libraries produce different results?
Libraries use different definitions, defaults, scales, and tree-building procedures.
Should importance values total 100 percent?
Only normalized values total 100 percent. Raw values usually do not.
Can feature importance values be negative?
Permutation importance can be negative when shuffling improves model performance.
How do correlated features affect importance?
Correlated predictors may divide, mask, or redistribute measured importance unfairly.
What is permutation importance?
It measures performance loss after randomly shuffling one feature's values.
How is SHAP importance different?
SHAP summarizes local contribution magnitudes using a game-theoretic attribution method.
Does feature importance prove causation?
No. Importance describes model behavior and never establishes causal relationships.