Mission Setup
Choose a task, difficulty, data source strategy, and operating constraints.
Score
0
Budget
3,000
Time left
07:00
Collected
0
Label accuracy
—
Quality score
0%
Mission progress0 / 60
Canvas Collection Pipeline
Select a card, inspect it, then collect, discard, review, or assign a label.
Shortcuts: C collect, D discard, R review
Selected Example
Select an incoming example on the canvas.
Assign label
Current Mission
Build a reliable starter dataset
Collect 60 useful examples with balanced labels and fewer than three unresolved quality issues.
Diversity coverage0%
Privacy safety100%
Class balance0%
Annotation Guideline Builder
Dataset Records
Search, sort, relabel, flag, or remove collected examples.
| ID | Example | Label | Source | Confidence | Flags | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No examples collected yet. | |||||||
Quality Audit
Run an audit after collecting examples.
Privacy and Governance
Feature and Target Review
Input features
Coverage and Fairness
Training, Validation, and Test Split
Configure a clean split while preventing duplicates, groups, and future information from leaking across sets.
Training0Used to fit the model
Validation0Used for model selection
Test0Used once for final evaluation
Model Training Simulation
Train a simulated model and see how dataset quality affects generalisation.
Accuracy
—
Precision
—
Recall
—
F1 score
—
Generalisation gap
—
Subgroup reliability
—
Class Distribution
Dataset Growth and Quality
Label Confidence
Training Results
Game Event Log
Learning Summary
- Representative data matters more than raw volume.
- Ambiguous labels require written annotation rules.
- Test data must remain independent and unseen.
- Privacy, fairness, and lineage belong in dataset design.
- Model errors reveal which examples to collect next.