Educational simulation: every reviewer, product, account, and behaviour record is fictional. A single clue never proves deception.
Case generator
Configure an investigation
Score
0
Accuracy
0%
Streak
0
Case
0 / 10
Time
--
Rank
Review Rookie
Investigation canvas
Select Start game
Game ready.
Investigation tools
Inspect the evidence
Choose a tool after starting a case.
Evidence notebook
Notes are stored locally.
Evidence selection
Which clues support your decision?
Final judgement
Classify this review
Batch and comparison
Related fictional reviews
Reviewer profile
Behaviour summary
| Start a case to inspect fictional account activity. |
Performance dashboard
Session analytics
How to play
Investigation workflow
- Read the review and account profile.
- Use tools to inspect wording and behaviour.
- Select evidence without treating one clue as proof.
- Choose genuine, suspicious, or uncertain.
- Set confidence and submit your decision.
Responsible detection
Fairness reminders
- Sentiment alone is insufficient.
- Unusual writing can have innocent causes.
- Protected traits are never risk signals.
- False accusations carry meaningful costs.
- Real moderation requires broader evidence.
Feature guide
Included game systems
Language analysis
Promotional phrasing, repetition, emotional exaggeration, detail level, grammar, and rating mismatch.
Behaviour analysis
Account age, review bursts, category spread, verified status, helpful votes, and posting intervals.
Learning feedback
Accuracy, calibration, false-positive control, missed evidence, ranks, streaks, hints, and local progress.